Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in proteomics: Past, present and future
Journal of Proteomics, ISSN: 1874-3919, Vol: 73, Issue: 11, Page: 2064-2077
2010
- 371Citations
- 537Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations371
- Citation Indexes371
- 371
- CrossRef340
- Captures537
- Readers537
- 537
Review Description
Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis has been instrumental in the birth and developments of proteomics, although it is no longer the exclusive separation tool used in the field of proteomics. In this review, a historical perspective is made, starting from the days where two-dimensional gels were used and the word proteomics did not even exist. The events that have led to the birth of proteomics are also recalled, ending with a description of the now well-known limitations of two-dimensional gels in proteomics. However, the often-underestimated advantages of two-dimensional gels are also underlined, leading to a description of how and when to use two-dimensional gels for the best in a proteomics approach. Taking support of these advantages (robustness, resolution, and ability to separate entire, intact proteins), possible future applications of this technique in proteomics are also mentioned.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874391910001752; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2010.05.016; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77957220211&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20685252; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1874391910001752; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2010.05.016
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know