The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A meta confirmatory factor analysis
Journal of Psychosomatic Research, ISSN: 0022-3999, Vol: 74, Issue: 1, Page: 74-81
2013
- 338Citations
- 2,120Usage
- 341Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations338
- Citation Indexes337
- 337
- CrossRef245
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Usage2,120
- Downloads1,950
- 1,950
- Abstract Views170
- Captures341
- Readers341
- 341
Article Description
To systematically evaluate the latent structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) through reanalysis of previous studies and meta confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Data from 28 samples were obtained from published studies concerning the latent structure of the HADS. Ten models were considered, including eight previously identified models and two bifactor models. The fit of each model was assessed separately in each sample and by meta CFA. Meta CFA was conducted using all samples and using subgroups consisting of community samples, cardiovascular disease samples and samples from studies administering the English language version of the HADS. A bifactor model including all items loading onto a general distress factor and two orthogonal anxiety and depression group factors provided the best fit for the majority of samples. Meta CFA provided further support for the bifactor model with two group factors. This was the case using all samples, as well as all subgroup analyses. The general distress factor explained 73% of the covariance between items, with the (autonomic) anxiety and (anhedonic) depression factors explaining 11% and 16%, respectively. A bifactor structure provides the most acceptable empirical explanation for the HADS correlation structure. Due to the presence of a strong general factor, the HADS does not provide good separation between symptoms of anxiety and depression. We recommend it is best used as a measure of general distress.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399912003054; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.10.010; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84871684338&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23272992; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022399912003054; https://epubs.rcsi.ie/psycholart/50; https://epubs.rcsi.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1050&context=psycholart; http://www.jpsychores.com/article/S0022-3999(12)00305-4/abstract
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know