Intrauterine inflammatory activation, functional progesterone withdrawal, and the timing of term and preterm birth
Journal of Reproductive Immunology, ISSN: 0165-0378, Vol: 125, Page: 89-99
2018
- 94Citations
- 167Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations94
- Citation Indexes94
- 94
- CrossRef82
- Captures167
- Readers167
- 167
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Preliminary Characterization of Cervical Microflora in Pregnant Women with Cervical Incompetence
Introduction The prevalence of cervical insufficiency in the general obstetric population is about 0.5%. However, this prevalence increases to about 8% in individuals with a
Review Description
The central role of inflammatory processes in labour and delivery is now well-recognised. However, the biomolecular, immunological and endocrine mechanisms involved in the labour process, and the clinical manifestations of inflammation in pregnancy, are complex, variable and modulated by factors such as aetiology, ethnicity and gestational age. In this review, evidence is presented of the pivotal relationship between progesterone and inflammation in pregnancy in terms of determining the timing of labour and delivery. The maternal inflammatory burden increases with advancing gestational age in response to endocrine, maturational, physical, metabolic and biochemical drivers, leading to functional progesterone withdrawal necessary for labour and delivery. Variability in the nature, timing and magnitude of these drivers influence the timing of delivery and the likelihood of preterm birth. Pathological inflammatory insults in pregnancy, such as infection, oxidative stress, senescence and maternal allograft rejection, can precipitate preterm birth, often involving common signalling pathways. Intrauterine infection is an important cause of early preterm birth, associated with delivery of the infants at greatest risk of death and disability; however, most preterm deliveries with intrauterine inflammatory activation are not infection-associated. This observation has important diagnostic and therapeutic implications and challenges. The key differences and similarities between infection-associated and sterile inflammation in this context are highlighted, and the clinical implications and significance of these processes and how they might be exploited are discussed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165037816306945; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2017.12.004; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85044347915&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29329080; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165037816306945; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2017.12.004
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know