Unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss: Novel causes and advanced treatment
Journal of Reproductive Immunology, ISSN: 0165-0378, Vol: 155, Page: 103785
2023
- 17Citations
- 36Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- CrossRef5
- Captures36
- Readers36
- 36
Review Description
In this study, recent research focusing on recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) are reviewed. Recurrent pregnancy loss is a devastating reproductive health burden that affects about 5% of couples trying to conceive globally. Currently, there are few evidence-based diagnostic and treatment strategies for RPL. More so, the number of unexplained etiology cases in patients with RPL arrives at 50%. Here, we discuss the progress in diagnosis and treatment of unexplained RPL, as well as recommended treatment strategies and controversial etiologies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016503782200314X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2022.103785; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85144509348&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36565611; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016503782200314X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2022.103785
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know