The effect of wolves on the exit and voicing exit of Swiss mountain farmers
Journal of Rural Studies, ISSN: 0743-0167, Vol: 96, Page: 167-179
2022
- 7Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Wolves are perceived as a threat by small ruminant farmers in Switzerland. In this study, we examined whether there is an association between exit from small ruminant farming and wolf prevalence. We drew on Hirshman's “exit, voice, and loyalty” theory to shed light on (1) farmers' exit strategies in the past and (2) famers' voice on future intentions of exiting (“voicing exit”), when dealing with wolves. Using farm panel data from Swiss small ruminant farmers (13,954 regular farms and 3758 Alpine summer farms), we first applied a mixed-effect logistic regression model to estimate famers' exit rate from small ruminant farming. We then conducted a survey among farmers (n = 928) to show correlations between the farmers' burden caused by wolves and intention of how long to continue farming and keeping small ruminants. We differentiated between regular “all-year” farms and Alpine summer farms. We were able to show that wolves, among other important factors, played a small but significant role in the exit from small ruminant farming, mainly on farms with small herds. The survey results also revealed that farmers exposed to greater wolf pressure were more likely to voice potential exit from small ruminant farming. In general, there is a real threat that farmers will exit small ruminant farming because of wolves. We highlight that farmers' exit from small ruminant farming should be seriously taken into account for further wolf management decisions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016722002546; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.016; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85141246254&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0743016722002546; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.016
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know