P-T-D evolution of the southeast Passo Feio Complex and the meaning of the Caçapava Lineament, Dom Feliciano Belt, southernmost Brazil
Journal of South American Earth Sciences, ISSN: 0895-9811, Vol: 112, Page: 103465
2021
- 9Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Metamorphic–deformation paths and interpretations of regional structures are essential for the understanding of how orogens evolve. While in active orogens, structures can be easily mapped for hundreds of kilometres, regional structures in ancient mountain belts may appear only as subsurface geophysical data. In this paper, we constrain the metamorphic–deformation history of the southeastern part of the Passo Feio Complex located in the Neoproterozoic Dom Feliciano Belt in southernmost Brazil. The complex is crosscut by a block-limiting structure defined by magnetometric data, the Caçapava Lineament. Our petrographic interpretations and thermodynamic modelling of pelitic schists of the Passo Feio Complex indicate the beginning of garnet growth at ca. 530–550 °C and 3–4.3 kbar during D 1, and metamorphic peak at ca. 560–570 °C and 5–5.5 kbar (M 1 ), during progression to D 2. After M 1 (~17–19 km depth), the complex was exhumed to at least 14 km (~4 kbar) depth, as the contact metamorphism by the Caçapava Granite (ca. 562 Ma) produced andalusite. The correlation of D 3 structures of the Passo Feio Complex (S 3 and L 3 ), magmatic structures in the Caçapava Granite, orientation of geophysical anomalies in the region and kinematics of S 3 corroborate the interpretation of the Caçapava Lineament as a dextral shear zone. Due to the location of anomalies and previous three-dimensional modelling of the granitic body, we interpret that a curved ENE to NS branch of the NE-striking Caçapava Shear Zone is responsible for the accommodation of the Caçapava Granite. Lastly, we discuss the regional implications of such interpretation, which brings up the question of block-limiting character of the Caçapava Shear Zone and the geotectonic position of the Passo Feio Complex.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895981121003126; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103465; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85113379131&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0895981121003126; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103465
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know