Composite pull-apart basin evolution: A discontinuum based numerical study
Journal of Structural Geology, ISSN: 0191-8141, Vol: 153, Page: 104462
2021
- 5Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Traditional models of pull-apart basins usually develop along two strike-slip faults. However, there is an important variant that does not fit with the traditional pull-apart basins. This study presents this type of pull-apart basin called composite pull-apart basin formed in a strike-slip system consisting of multiple master fault segments. A set of two-dimensional discontinuum based, scaled, elastic models in upper crust are built to provide insights on composite pull-apart basin evolution. Three representative fault segment interaction geometries are modeled, showing underlapping, neutral, and overlapping releasing steps. They produce similar composite pull-apart basins consisting of two or three en echelon rhomboidal subbasins as offset increases. However, a change of initial fault geometry from underlapping to neutral and overlapping causes the fracture pattern to be more diffuse. The underlapping model produces a composite pull-apart basin with a throughgoing fault evolving from cross-basin faults in the subbasins whereas composite pull-apart basins produced in neutral and overlapping systems have no cross-basin faults and throughgoing faults. Modeling results show that local extension in underlapping systems with both pure strike-slip and 5° transtension is accommodated through development of R-shears, small subbasins, cross-basin faults obliquely cutting the subbasins, and throughgoing fault. The morphology and structural evolution of composite pull-apart basins are determined by factors including pre-existing master strike-slip fault geometries (underlapping, neutral, or overlapping), fault kinematics (pure strike-slip, transtension, or transpression), and strike-slip displacements corresponding to evolution stages. The composite pull-apart basin geometries and fracture patterns of our numerical models fit well with natural examples such as the Gulf of Aqaba and the northern part of the Marmara Sea.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814121001863; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2021.104462; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85117219896&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0191814121001863; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2021.104462
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know