K-optimal designs for parameters of shifted Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes and sheets
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, ISSN: 0378-3758, Vol: 186, Page: 28-41
2017
- 4Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Continuous random processes and fields are regularly applied to model temporal or spatial phenomena in many different fields of science, and model fitting is usually done with the help of data obtained by observing the given process at various time points or spatial locations. In these practical applications sampling designs which are optimal in some sense are of great importance. We investigate the properties of the recently introduced K-optimal design for temporal and spatial linear regression models driven by Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes and sheets, respectively, and highlight the differences compared with the classical D-optimal sampling. A simulation study displays the superiority of the K-optimal design for large parameter values of the driving random process.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378375817300162; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2017.02.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85014401483&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378375817300162; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2017.02.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know