Contraction of a quasi-Bayesian model with shrinkage priors in precision matrix estimation
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, ISSN: 0378-3758, Vol: 221, Page: 154-171
2022
- 1Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Currently several Bayesian approaches are available to estimate large sparse precision matrices, including Bayesian graphical Lasso (Wang, 2012), Bayesian structure learning (Banerjee and Ghosal, 2015), and graphical horseshoe (Li et al., 2019). Although these methods have exhibited nice empirical performances, in general they are computationally expensive. Moreover, only a few theoretical results are available for Bayesian graphical models with continuous shrinkage priors. A very recent work (Sagar et al., 2021) studies the posterior concentration properties of the graphical horseshoe prior and graphical horseshoe-like priors under a full likelihood model. In this paper, we propose a new method that integrates some commonly used continuous shrinkage priors into a quasi-Bayesian framework featured by a pseudo-likelihood. Under mild conditions, we establish an optimal posterior contraction rate for the proposed method. Compared to existing approaches, our method has two main advantages. First, our method is computationally efficient while achieving similar error rate; second, our framework is amenable to theoretical analysis. Extensive simulation experiments and the analysis on a real data set are supportive of our theoretical results.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378375822000301; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2022.03.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85129726624&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378375822000301; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2022.03.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know