Facilitators and barriers of life jacket use for drowning prevention: Qualitative evidence synthesis
Journal of Safety Research, ISSN: 0022-4375, Vol: 80, Page: 135-147
2022
- 3Citations
- 38Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- Captures38
- Readers38
- 38
Article Description
Background: Drowning is a public health problem globally. Despite substantial evidence on the effectiveness of life jackets, their use for drowning prevention has remained low. This study aims to understand the barriers and facilitators of life jacket use. Methods: We searched four major electronic databases, contacted experts, hand-searched conference abstracts and screened reference lists to identify primary qualitative studies. We used the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklist for quality appraisal and the PROGRESS Plus framework to understand equity issues. Thematic analysis was conducted. Results: We retrieved 1153 records and finally included ten studies that met eligibility criteria. All except two studies were from high-income countries. Four key themes were identified. Firstly, life jacket use was shaped through complex interactions between lived experience and cultural norms which influenced the risk-perception of life jacket utility in preventing deaths. Secondly, the high cost of life jackets was almost always a barrier for its usage. Thirdly, adoption of laws and its subsequent enforcement was perceived to be an important facilitator for life jacket use. Lastly, design issues around comfort, fashion-sense, and shelf life influenced usage. Conclusion: The results of this qualitative evidence synthesis should be considered for health promotion, legal and policy interventions to promote the uptake of life jackets. There is a need for better understanding of perceptions and their role in the uptake of safety behaviours in different countries including the role of equity issues on the use of life jackets.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437521001481; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.11.010; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85122012110&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35249594; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022437521001481; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.11.010
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know