Comparing walkability methods: Creation of street smart walk score and efficacy of a code-based 3D walkability index
Journal of Transport & Health, ISSN: 2214-1405, Vol: 21, Page: 101005
2021
- 36Citations
- 118Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Findings are reported from the original study that supported the creation and validation of the current road network-based (“Street Smart”) version of Walk Score. It shows how Street Smart Walk Score improved upon the former “airline” (Euclidean, crow-fly or straight-line) distance method. It further compares the ability to predict objectively measured physical activity between the original airline Walk Score and Street Smart Walk Score methods and a code-based composite three-dimensional “Walkability Index” of net-residential density, land use mix, street connectivity, and retail floor area ratio. The three walkability approaches were linked with objective physical activity data from 2,199 participants in the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study and compared. Walk Score's classic airline-based distance method to assess proximity to destinations was dramatically enhanced to form the new network-based method. A road network method to measure distance was created. A non-linear distance decay function with distance-based weights was also developed for specific destinations. Inclusion of a link-node ratio measure of connectivity and removal of schools was advised. Findings were externally validated using similar data from another region. The code-based Walkability Index remained the best predictor of physical activity even after all of the enhancements were made to create a network-based Walk Score which was positively associated with moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Each step of the Walk Score calibration process further improved the strength of association with MVPA. Destination proximity used by Walk Score provides a useful measure of accessibility for a wide range of end-users. However, from a policy perspective, it is essential to measure features enforceable through development regulations. Components of these regulations are contained in the Walkability Index. Presence of shops, restaurants, and other destinations captured by Walk Score can be enabled but not mandated through these regulated features.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140520302097; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2020.101005; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85102045596&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214140520302097; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2214140520302097?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2214140520302097?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2020.101005
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know