Evidence on optimal risk allocation models for Indonesian geothermal projects under PPP contracts
Utilities Policy, ISSN: 0957-1787, Vol: 81, Page: 101511
2023
- 7Citations
- 108Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This study explores risk allocation in Indonesia's public-private partnerships for geothermal energy development. Such activity involves significant upfront investment, but no definitive and transparent risk-sharing mechanisms that suitably incentivise the private sector have emerged in the literature. In the study, we develop an evidence-based framework founded on principal-agency theorising that suggests an optimal allocation of risk between the public and private parties in these arrangements. A Delphi survey is employed to identify the views of a group of experts, with the evidence pointing to a clear pattern in identifying high-risk factors and optimal risk-sharing arrangements. Suggested risk-bearing levels for the Indonesian government range between 100% (for legal and regulatory exposures) to 0% in an operational and maintenance risk context. Risks relating to resource and exploration, finance and credit, as well as field development and construction issues, are viewed as being optimally shared between the parties, with the expert panel suggesting that the public sector should retain more exposure where high criticality risk factors exist. The proposed risk allocations reflect both evidenced outcomes and prior contention regarding the risks around geothermal investments and thereby provide the potential for developing meaningful schematics that enable Indonesia to exploit the resources concerned more fully.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178723000231; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101511; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85150822930&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0957178723000231; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101511
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know