Choice Consistency in Discrete Choice Experiments: Does Numeracy Skill Matter?
Value in Health, ISSN: 1098-3015, Vol: 27, Issue: 11, Page: 1594-1604
2024
- 13Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Researchers' Work from University of Newcastle Focuses on CDC and FDA (Choice Consistency In Discrete Choice Experiments: Does Numeracy Skill Matter?)
2024 DEC 09 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at CDC & FDA Daily -- Fresh data on CDC and FDA are presented
Article Description
This study investigated the relationship between numeracy skills (NS) and choice consistency in discrete choice experiments (DCEs). A DCE was conducted to explore patients’ preferences for kidney transplantation in Italy. Patients completed the DCE and answered 3-item numeracy questions. A heteroskedastic multinomial logit model was used to investigate the effect of numeracy on choice consistency. Higher NS were associated with greater choice consistency, increasing the scale to 1.63 ( P <.001), 1.39 ( P <.001), and 1.18 ( P <.001) for patients answering 3 of 3, 2 of 3, and 1 of 3 questions correctly, respectively, compared with those with no correct answers. This corresponded to 63%, 39%, and 18% more consistent choices, respectively. Accounting for choice consistency resulted in varying willingness-to-wait (WTW) estimates for kidney transplant attributes. Patients with the lowest numeracy (0/3) were willing to wait approximately 42 months [95% CI: 29.37, 54.68] for standard infectious risk, compared with 33 months [95% CI: 28.48, 38.09] for 1 of 3, 28 months [95% CI: 25.13, 30.32] for 2 of 3, and 24 months [95% CI: 20.51, 27.25] for 3 of 3 correct answers. However, WTW differences for an additional year of graft survival and neoplastic risk were not statistically significant across numeracy levels. Supplementary analyses of 2 additional DCEs on COVID-19 vaccinations and rheumatoid arthritis, conducted online, supported these findings: higher NS were associated with more consistent choices across different disease contexts and survey formats. The findings suggested that combining patients with varying NS could bias WTW estimates, highlighting the need to consider numeracy in DCE data analysis and interpretation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301524027827; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2024.07.001; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85203831917&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39094694; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1098301524027827
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know