Assessment of heart rate measurements obtained from a smart collar compared to 24-h Holter monitoring in healthy dogs
Journal of Veterinary Cardiology, ISSN: 1760-2734, Vol: 57, Page: 58-64
2025
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The primary objective was to compare the 24-h mean heart rate (HR) provided by a smart collar with 24-h ambulatory electrocardiography (Holter) in healthy dogs. The secondary objective was to compare the 2-min HR values between the two methods during periods of activity and rest. Twelve healthy dogs were fitted with both Holter monitors and smart collars. Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman (BA) agreement analysis were used to compare the 24-h mean HR between two methods. The BA analysis for repeated measures and bias plots were used to compare 2-min HR between methods. The regression analysis showed no significant differential or proportional bias between the methods to estimate 24-h mean HR. The BA analysis showed a mean bias of 2.2 beats per minute (bpm) (95% confidence interval = −0.2, 4.8) with an upper limit of agreement (LOA) of 9.6 bpm (5.1, 14.1) and a lower LOA of −5.1 bpm (−9.5 to −0.6). However, BA analysis of 2-min HR showed poor agreement between methods with wide LOAs at rest and during activity. The smart collar did not provide any HR information for 43% of the total possible recording duration (range = 24%–79%). The smart collar can provide a potentially clinically useful estimate of 24-h HR in dogs with normal sinus rhythm. The collar did not provide reliable 2-min HR measurements due to inaccuracies in HR estimation during periods of activity and the inability to report any HR during large periods of the recording.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1760273424001267; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvc.2024.11.002; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85211706226&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39675258; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1760273424001267
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know