The Environmental Impact of Interventional Radiology: An Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from an Academic Interventional Radiology Practice
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, ISSN: 1051-0443, Vol: 32, Issue: 6, Page: 907-915.e3
2021
- 61Citations
- 100Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations61
- Citation Indexes61
- 61
- CrossRef20
- Captures100
- Readers100
- 100
- Mentions2
- News Mentions2
- News2
Most Recent News
Sustainable radiology: why it takes more than “greener” imaging systems
Despite the strong Irish presence at this year’s ECR – courtesy of Congress President Prof Adrian Brady – it’s clear that radiology is lacking in
Article Description
To calculate the volume of greenhouse gases (GHGs) generated by a hospital-based interventional radiology (IR) department. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to calculate GHGs emitted by an IR department at a tertiary care academic medical center. The volume of waste generated, amount of disposable supplies and linens used, and the operating times of electrical equipment were recorded for procedures performed between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM on 5 consecutive weekdays. LCA was then performed using purchasing data, plug loads for electrical hardware, data from temperature control units, and estimates of emissions related to travel in the area surrounding the medical center. Ninety-eight procedures were performed on 97 patients. The most commonly performed procedures were drainages (30), placement and removal of venous access (21), and computed tomography–guided biopsies (13). Approximately 23,500 kg CO 2 e were emitted during the study. Sources of CO 2 emissions in descending order were related to indoor climate control (11,600 kg CO 2 e), production and transportation of disposable surgical items (9,640 kg CO 2 e), electricity plug load for equipment and lighting (1,060 kg CO 2 e), staff transportation (524 kg CO 2 e), waste disposal (426 kg CO 2 e), production, laundering, and disposal of linens (279 kg CO 2 e), and gas anesthetics (19.3 kg CO 2 e). The practice of IR generates substantial GHG volumes, a majority of which come from energy used to maintain climate control, followed by emissions related to single-use surgical supplies. Efforts to reduce the environmental impact of IR may be focused accordingly.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051044321009350; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2021.03.531; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85107319377&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33794372; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1051044321009350; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2021.03.531
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know