Implications of IR Being a Primary Specialty on the Professional Organizational Relationship between Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, ISSN: 1051-0443, Vol: 34, Issue: 12, Page: 2080-2084
2023
- 2Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
The recent awarding of primary specialty status to interventional radiology (IR) invites a re-examination of the long-standing relationship between IR and diagnostic radiology (DR). In this new era, it is important to evaluate how the organizations that represent these 2 specialties can best contribute to strengthening a growth in collaborations and partnerships that will benefit their members and patients. Areas of organizational focus with the potential to enhance the future for both groups include combining efforts directed toward advocacy and government relations, developing practice models to create successful IR and DR working relationships, and providing more data to demonstrate the value of IR above and beyond the work relative value units and professional revenues that IR generates.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051044323005997; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2023.08.011; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85176966400&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38008543; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1051044323005997; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2023.08.011
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know