A rapid Focus-Forming Assay for quantification of infectious adenoviral vectors
Journal of Virological Methods, ISSN: 0166-0934, Vol: 297, Page: 114267
2021
- 7Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef3
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
Currently available methods to titrate adenoviral vectors (AdV) in the absence of a gene reporter such as GFP, are either time-consuming or not very reproducible. A Focus-Forming Assay (FFA) for quantification of infectious AdV particles followed by automated focus counting was developed using new monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the human adenovirus type 5. Briefly, in this method, 96-well plates of HEK293A cells were infected with 2-fold dilutions of AdV at seeding time. Forty eight hours post-infection, the cells were fixed with methanol. The cells were then incubated with each mAb followed by a FITC conjugated anti-mouse antibody. The plates were scanned and positive cells counted using an automated fluorescence microscopy system. The results of the FFA were compared with the plaque assay and the TCID 50 assay. The titer of six different recombinant AdV were compared using the FFA along with a commercial kit. The results were similar, but in contrast to the commercial kit for which the stained cells are counted manually, the software automatically counts the positives cells in the FFA. The automatic counting of positive cells makes the FFA a more precise and reliable assay compared to the commercial kit for titration of AdV.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166093421002068; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114267; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85114741367&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437873; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166093421002068; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114267
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know