PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Moderate-pain versus pain-free exercise, walking capacity, and cardiovascular health in patients with peripheral artery disease

Journal of Vascular Surgery, ISSN: 0741-5214, Vol: 70, Issue: 1, Page: 148-156
2019
  • 28
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 173
    Captures
  • 27
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Most Recent News

Shiny Skin on Legs Could Be the First Sign of Peripheral Artery Disease — What Doctors Want You to Know

It’s no secret that as we get older, our bodies start to react differently to the same activities. Clutching the pages of a paperback can

Article Description

Supervised exercise training (walking) is recommended in patients with intermittent claudication, both as a means to improve symptoms (walking distance and quality of life [QoL]) and as a means to improve general cardiovascular health (including vascular function and heart rate variability [HRV]). Our aim was to compare two types of supervised training (moderate-pain and pain-free walking) with comparable intensity based on heart rate, in terms of walking capacity, QoL, vascular function, biomarkers, and HRV in patients with intermittent claudication. Thirty-six adults with intermittent claudication were randomized to either moderate-pain or pain-free exercise training (36 sessions, two or three times a week) or usual care (no supervised exercise). Initial walking distance and absolute walking distance using treadmill testing, flow-mediated vasodilation and pulse wave velocity using ultrasound, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and fibrinogen levels, HRV, and QoL (36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire) were determined at baseline and after the intervention period. Twenty-nine patients (mean age, 64 ± 9 years; 72% male) completed the study. Both training programs similarly improved walking capacity. Initial walking distance and absolute walking distance significantly increased with either moderate-pain walking (median, 50 m to 107 m [ P  =.005] and 85 m to 194 m [ P  =.005], respectively) or pain-free walking (median, 53 m to 128 m [ P  =.003] and 92 m to 163 m [ P  =.003], respectively). QoL also similarly improved with both training modalities, whereas only moderate-pain walking was also associated with a statistically significant improvement in the vascular parameters flow-mediated vasodilation (4.4% to 8.0%; P  =.002) and pulse wave velocity (6.6 m/s to 6.1 m/s; P  =.013). Neither training program was associated with changes in biomarker levels and HRV. Both moderate-pain and pain-free training modalities were safe and similarly improved walking capacity and health-related QoL. Conversely, vascular function improvements were associated with only moderate-pain walking.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know