Removal of Cr(VI) from tanning wastewater using chitosan-SDS complexes in PEUF: Optimization and analysis via response surface methodology
Journal of Water Process Engineering, ISSN: 2214-7144, Vol: 54, Page: 103966
2023
- 6Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this study, we addressed the removal of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)), a highly toxic and soluble anionic heavy metal, using enhanced ultrafiltration (UF). The objective was to eliminate Cr(VI) species with molecular weights beyond the retention capability of standard UF membranes and achieve their retention through the incorporation of polymers and polymer-surfactant complexes within the UF membrane. Chitosan, a cationic polymer, and sodium lauryl sulfate (SDS), an anionic surfactant, were used in this context. The Cr(VI) solution was subjected to ultrafiltration in a laboratory-scale membrane cell, and its removal was assessed spectrophotometrically. Polymer and surfactant structures were characterized using turbidity, electrical conductivity, SEM-EDX, and FTIR analyses. Experimental studies were conducted using the face-centered central composite design (CCD) of the response surface methodology (RSM) to determine optimal removal and permeate flux values, as well as to unveil the relationships between the studied factors and the resulting responses. The results revealed that 100 % of the Cr(VI) species were removed from wastewater in the chitosan-based polymer-enhanced ultrafiltration (PEUF) study. With the chitosan-SDS complex, a removal efficiency of 98.33 % was achieved in synthetic wastewater. The PEUF study employing chitosan and the chitosan-SDS complex yielded permeate flux values of 30.73 L/h/m 2 and 53.89 L/h/m 2, respectively. The optimized conditions obtained from the models were then applied to real wastewater obtained from a leather industry tanning process. In the case of chitosan and the chitosan-SDS complex, the Cr(VI) removal efficiencies in the real wastewater were 4.40 % and 98.33 %, respectively.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214714423004853; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103966; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85163154191&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214714423004853; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103966
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know