AI-driven modelling approaches for predicting oxygen levels in aquatic environments
Journal of Water Process Engineering, ISSN: 2214-7144, Vol: 66, Page: 105940
2024
- 5Citations
- 18Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Reliable water quality models are crucial for better water management and pollution control. Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and dissolved oxygen (DO) are the widely recognized indicators used to examine the quality of water. Stakeholders often face challenges when it comes to monitoring water quality indicators daily. The conventional approach for testing is laborious and costly. Therefore, there is a need to incorporate alternate concepts for predicting water quality parameters. This article proposes a novel approach “Autoencoder-Deep-Autoregressive (AE-DeepAR)” to predict the concentration of BOD and DO using in-situ measurable water quality parameters as input. The autoencoder is employed to utilize a latent space that accurately captures the fundamental characteristics of the nonlinear data. On the other hand, the DeepAR model is utilized to produce point predictions. This approach is being implemented in the Mahanadi River system for the first time. It is found that conductivity, total suspended solids (TSS), turbidity, and ammoniacal nitrogen ( NH3 -N) are correlated with BOD. Likewise, turbidity, temperature, and total dissolved solids (TDS) correlate significantly with DO. The performance of the AE-DeepAR model in predicting BOD surpasses that of other models at all stations. The R2 range from 0.90 to 0.93, mean absolute error (MAE) varies from 0.061 to 0.147, mean squared error (MSE) lies between 0.005 to 0.028, and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) differs from 9.20% to 19.95%. All stations show a greater degree of sensitivity. The uncertainty observed is less in most circumstances, but the unpredictability of the values caused by the occurrence of outliers in severe events may influence the outcome. The PICP value varies between 87 % to 95 % in BOD and 89 % to 95 % in DO. The results reveal that AE-DeepAR can be used as an alternative approach to predict BOD and DO with a high degree of accuracy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214714424011723; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105940; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85201072304&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214714424011723; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105940
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know