Building the meaning of preference from logical paired structures
Knowledge-Based Systems, ISSN: 0950-7051, Vol: 83, Issue: 1, Page: 32-41
2015
- 11Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Making decisions by learning preferences requires to consider semantical aspects dealing with the meaning and use of the preference concept. Examining recent developments on bipolarity, where concepts are measured/verified regarding a pair of opposite poles, we focus on the dialectic process by which the meaning of concepts emerges. Our proposal is based on the neutrality in between the opposite poles, such that a basic type of structure is used to characterize in logical terms the concepts and the knowledge that they generate. In this paper we model the meaning of concepts by paired structures, and apply these structures for learning and building the different meanings of preference for decision making.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705115000970; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.03.005; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84933181553&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0950705115000970; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0950705115000970?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0950705115000970?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.03.005
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know