Consensus analysis for AHP multiplicative preference relations based on consistency control: A heuristic approach
Knowledge-Based Systems, ISSN: 0950-7051, Vol: 191, Page: 105317
2020
- 37Citations
- 39Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Consistency and consensus play different, but essential roles when solving group decision making problems using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP), in which multiplicative preference relations are used to represent individual pairwise comparison preferences. The existing AHP frameworks developed to manage individual consistency and group consensus have been widely investigated. However, in these frameworks, the consistency is often destroyed in the consensus reaching process, which means that the revised decision makers’ judgments have little relationship to Saaty’s original 1/9-9 evaluation scale. This paper outlines a new approach to aid the consensus decision making process, for which two heuristic algorithms are developed. The first algorithm is designed to assist the decision maker in achieving a predefined consistency level, and the second is designed to achieve consensus while controlling the individual consistency level. Several classical numerical examples are compared to validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Finally, some simulations are conducted to further demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach for general cases.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705119305969; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105317; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85076205593&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0950705119305969; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0950705119305969?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0950705119305969?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105317
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know