A reliable version of choquistic regression based on evidence theory
Knowledge-Based Systems, ISSN: 0950-7051, Vol: 205, Page: 106252
2020
- 5Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Choquistic regression is an elegant generalisation of logistic regression, which preserves its monotonicity whilst alleviating its linearity. However, much as logistic regression, it lacks self-awareness, that is, an ability to represent the ignorance ( aka epistemic uncertainty) involved in its predictions, which is crucial in safety-critical classification problems. Recently, an extension of logistic regression was introduced to remedy this issue for this latter classifier. This extension is formalised within evidence theory and relies in particular on a sound method for statistical inference and prediction developed in this framework. In this paper, a similar extension is derived for choquistic regression. The usefulness of the obtained approach is confirmed empirically in classification problems where cautiousness in decision-making is allowed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705120304482; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106252; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85088051433&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0950705120304482; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0950705120304482?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0950705120304482?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106252
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know