Training fuzzy inference system-based classifiers with Krill Herd optimization
Knowledge-Based Systems, ISSN: 0950-7051, Vol: 214, Page: 106625
2021
- 3Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In recent years, researchers have been able to access many novel metaheuristic algorithms inspired by natural phenomena. One such bio-inspired optimization routine is Krill Herd Algorithm (KHA). In this study, a new approach for modification of membership function parameters in a fuzzy inference system (FIS) is demonstrated. Here, the main intent is to compare KHA optimization with other heuristic and metaheuristic algorithms, as a means to train FIS structures. The proposed FIS training method has been designed to serve as a fuzzy classifier. Hence, benchmark data sets extracted from the University of California, Irvine (UCI) Machine Learning Repository were applied, while Classification Errors and Sum of Squared Errors were used as measures for evaluation criteria. The obtained results led to the conclusion that the utilization of KHA provides promising performance, especially in the case of imbalanced data—whether in terms of the classification measures or the time required for an adequate FIS training.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705120307541; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106625; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85099059384&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0950705120307541; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0950705120307541?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0950705120307541?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106625
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know