Adaptive label secondary reconstruction for missing multi-label learning
Knowledge-Based Systems, ISSN: 0950-7051, Vol: 299, Page: 112019
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In multi-label learning, an instance is often associated with multiple labels, posing a challenge in obtaining the complete set of labels. This difficulty arises from the interference of missing information, which existing methods struggle to overcome by reconstructing the original labels only once. Therefore, an adaptive label secondary reconstruction for missing multi-label learning called ALSRML is proposed. First, based on reliable label learning, the observable label information is projected into a soft label matrix. Second, ALSRML reconstructs each soft label with the help of a self-expression model. The two levels of reconstructed labels are able to promote each other, resulting in better recovery of missing labels. Then, k -nearest-neighbor instance correlation is used to guide the soft label matrix in obtaining a reliable structure. Finally, ALSRML utilizes local label correlation and ℓ2,1−2 -norm to constrain the feature coefficient matrix to be stable and sparse. ALSRML demonstrates its superiority over seven state-of-the-art comparison algorithms across most missing rates through comparison experiments and statistical tests on sixteen datasets. Notably, it achieves significant performance improvements of about 43%, 50%, 85%, and 20% in the metrics of Ranking loss, One-error, Average precision, and AUC at 90% missing rate. Ablation experiments further validate the effectiveness of label secondary reconstruction in recovering missing labels.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705124006531; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112019; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85195219361&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0950705124006531; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112019
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know