Integrating GIS, deep learning, and environmental sensors for multicriteria evaluation of urban street walkability
Landscape and Urban Planning, ISSN: 0169-2046, Vol: 230, Page: 104603
2023
- 43Citations
- 217Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The walkability of urban streets (WoUS) benefits public health and urban livability, but there is still no consensus on the quantitative and comprehensive evaluation of walkability. However, emerging deep-learning, sensor-network, and GIS technologies suggest the possibility of overcoming previous limitations. Therefore, this study explores a new approach for multicriteria evaluation of WoUS, including physical and perceived walkability. After capturing street-view images, traffic-flow data, and environmental-sensor data covering the streets to be analyzed, we automatically calculate physical walkability from four criteria (walkability index, street quality, traffic flow, and physical environment). We first integrate 2-dimensional analysis of walk score, noise, and light using GIS, then perform 3-dimensional composition calculations of greenery, enclosure, and relative walking width using semantic segmentation, vehicle density using multi-object tracking, and indicator weighting distributions using an analytic hierarchy process. Perceived walkability is evaluated by a hierarchy of walking needs model comprising feasibility, accessibility, safety, comfort, and pleasurability. As an empirical study, we conduct an experiment within Anonymous University for physical and perceived walkability evaluations. The results indicate that with perceived WoUS as a benchmark, the automated physical WoUS results reveal the strengths in data integration and processing that are feasible, reliable, and cost-effective. This was an initial attempt at constructing an integrated research methodology for WoUS from various walking-related variables. This framework could support designers as an assistive tool for generating both quantitative and qualitative judgments from various criteria and recommending walkable pedestrians paths to motivate people to walk further, longer, and more often, rather than providing the shortest paths based on a path-finding algorithm.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204622002523; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104603; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85140338338&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169204622002523; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104603
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know