Metacognitive scaffolding for digital reading and mind-wandering in adults with and without ADHD
Learning and Instruction, ISSN: 0959-4752, Vol: 95, Page: 102051
2025
- 22Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures22
- Readers22
- 22
Article Description
Digital reading can heighten attention-sustaining challenges and escalate disparities in reading comprehension and monitoring between learners with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, the adaptability of digital platforms enables the systematic integration of learning scaffolds. Thus, when optimally adapted, these platforms could present unique benefits for learners with ADHD who might not fully exploit generic in-depth processing instructions like summary generation. This study aimed to investigate the effect of gradually incorporating metacognitive scaffolding on reading comprehension and monitoring in adults with and without ADHD. Moreover, it delved into the mediating role of mind-wandering, a phenomenon commonly linked with sustained attention difficulties. The study comprised 210 adults aged 20–50, of which 50.05% were diagnosed with ADHD. Participants were randomized into either a control or scaffolding condition. Across both conditions, they read a lengthy expository digital text, composed a summary, evaluated their mind-wandering episodes, and then responded to comprehension questions while rating their confidence. The scaffolding condition provided additional stage-specific guidance to direct attention and enhance self-regulation. In the control condition, the ADHD group underperformed in reading comprehension and reported lower confidence compared to the non-ADHD group. However, within the scaffolding condition, comprehension and confidence levels were comparable across both groups. Notably, state mind-wandering mediated comprehension differences between the ADHD and non-ADHD groups, but only in the control condition. Strategically incorporating instructions throughout distinct reading stages can mitigate the impact of excessive mind-wandering, narrowing the comprehension disparities between readers with and without ADHD.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224001786; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102051; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85208455585&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959475224001786; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102051
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know