Acceleration of wound healing activity with syringic acid in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats
Life Sciences, ISSN: 0024-3205, Vol: 233, Page: 116728
2019
- 59Citations
- 100Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations59
- Citation Indexes59
- 59
- CrossRef14
- Captures100
- Readers100
- 100
Article Description
Impaired wound healing is a serious concern of uncontrolled hyperglycemia that can lead to gangrene, and even death. There is an urgent need to look for better alternative therapy because of the undesirable side effects of currently available synthetic drugs in the market. Syringic acid (SA) is a natural phenolic compound abundantly available in edible fruits and plants. In this study, wound healing activities of 2.5% and 5.0% SA were evaluated in type 2 diabetic rats using incisional wound model. SA-treated diabetic wounds showed faster rate of wound closure and epithelization with enhanced contents of hydroxyproline and protein compared to diabetic wounds. SA effectively prevents alterations in blood glucose levels, serum insulin and dyslipidemia in diabetic wound rats. The SA-treated diabetic wounds after 14 days of treatment demonstrated inhibition of pro-inflammatory response (NF-κB p65, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-8 and IL-2) with improvement in anti-inflammatory response (IL-10), inhibited the elevated oxidative stress and decreased the concentrations of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-2, −8 and −9) and increased the concentrations of TIMP-1 & TIMP- 2. Furthermore, the diabetic wounds were presented with an increase in expression of CD 31 and 68, growth factors (TGF-β1, collagen-I and α-SMA and VEGF) with significant improvement in collagen deposition, re-epithelialization and complete skin structure as revealed by histological analysis after treatment of diabetic wounds with SA for 14 days. Hence, the results of this study designate that SA significantly improves wound healing in diabetic rats and could be used as a potential therapy for treatment of diabetic wounds.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024320519306551; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116728; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070385052&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31386877; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0024320519306551; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116728
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know