Prospective pyroxenite–peridotite mixed mantle source for the northern Carlsberg Ridge
Lithos, ISSN: 0024-4937, Vol: 436, Page: 106980
2023
- 5Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The geochemical heterogeneity of the mantle source beneath the mid-ocean ridge has been well studied, while the lithologic variability within the source has yet been rarely mentioned. We report new major, trace elements, and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic data of fresh mid-ocean ridge basalts from the northern part of Carlsberg Ridge (i.e., CR Seg-1). The geological and geophysical observations, such as the lesser spreading rate, greater axial depth, and higher mantle Bouguer anomaly of the Seg-1, all indicate magma deficiency and lower melting degree, whereas the segment's lower average Na 8 and higher Ca 8 /Al 8 indicate a higher apparent melting degree. These contradictions cannot be reconciled by melting the lithologically homogeneous peridotite mantle. We proposed that fusible pyroxenite components in the Seg-1 source melt preferentially and generate lower Na 8 magma. Moreover, it cools the ascending mantle and decreases the supply of melt derived from peridotite, leading to a magma shortage in the segment. The garnet signature revealed by the rare earth elements, higher Zn/Fe and Fe/Mn ratios, and source enrichment evidenced by Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes, support the presence of a trace quantity of garnet-pyroxenite in the mantle source. The mixing model of trace elements supports the origin of Seg-1 MORBs by mixing the depleted peridotite-derived melt and the enriched pyroxenite-derived melt. Based on the significant negative correlation between Fe/Mn and 206 Pb/ 204 Pb, the delaminated lower continental crust, which might not be completely homogenized in the convective mantle, may have been transformed into the pyroxene-rich rock. The retained material would then result in lithological heterogeneity, probably in the form of pyroxenite, and cause geochemical anomalies within the source mantle for mid-ocean ridge basalts.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024493722003899; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2022.106980; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85143972006&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0024493722003899; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2022.106980
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know