Heterogeneity of variance for milk, fat and protein yield in small cattle populations: The Rendena breed as a case study
Livestock Science, ISSN: 1871-1413, Vol: 213, Page: 54-60
2018
- 5Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The aim of this work was to study the possible heterogeneity of variance for productive traits in the small Rendena cattle population. The herds were divided into two productive levels (medium and high) based on average milk yield recorded in each farm. A total of 171,104 test-day records of milk, fat and protein yields belonging to 10,430 cows were used to estimate genetic parameters among groups in separated analysis that accounted for primiparous cows only or for up to the third lactation animals (whole dataset). The (co)variance components were greater in high than in medium productive levels for both milk, fat and protein yields, both in the primiparous dataset and in the whole dataset. Heritability for all yields traits in the medium productive level was lower (0.160, 0.134 and 0.137, resp.) than in the high productive level (0.292, 0.230 and 0.234) and on average greater when primiparous cows were analysed alone (from 0.025 to 0.045 in medium and high productive group, resp.). However, the genetic correlations between productive groups resulted greater than 0.965 for all productive traits and in both datasets analysed. The rank correlation between EBVs of bulls that had daughters in both groups was 0.99, but a significant deviation from the theoretical frequency expected in medium and high productive groups was observed in the number of top cows. This may be related to the heterogeneity of variance. This study suggests the need for a correction method for the heterogeneous variance in the small cattle breed used as a case study, particularly in the selection of best cows that are more susceptible to biases in EBVs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141318301240; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2018.05.002; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85047111024&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1871141318301240; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1871141318301240?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1871141318301240?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2018.05.002
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know