A comparative study for determination of thermal inactivation parameters of Salmonella in high gel and standard egg white powder using three methods
LWT, ISSN: 0023-6438, Vol: 172, Page: 114185
2022
- 20Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures20
- Readers20
- 20
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Studies from School of Bioengineering and Food Science Update Current Data on Food Safety (A Comparative Study for Determination of Thermal Inactivation Parameters of Salmonella In High Gel and Standard Egg White Powder Using Three Methods)
2023 FEB 14 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Food Daily News -- Current study results on Foodborne Diseases and Conditions -
Article Description
Egg white powder (EWP), the main ingredient in many food products, is widely used in the food industry due to its whipping, textural properties and practical advantages. Significant food safety risks might occur when contamination/cross-contamination takes place after a lethal processing step. It is critical to use appropriate D- and Z-values to evaluate the food safety risks. However, different thermal destructing methods may result in discrepancies in thermal resistance values of the same food matrix. Four isothermal treatments at 75, 80, 85, and 90 °C were studied in EWP using three methods for comparison, thermal death disks water bath (TDWB), plastic bags water bath (PBWB), and plastic bags dry bath (PBDB). D-values for Salmonella under four isothermal temperatures were greater (P < 0.05) in Standard EWP compared to High Gel EWP, respectively; The average Z-values for Salmonella were in the range of 10.62 °C–14.57 °C. D-values resulted significant difference (P < 0.05) using TDWB and PBWB, but no significant difference was observed between PBDB and PBWB. These results can be potentially applied for EWP pasteurization, and PBDB may provid a better way of studying a large variety of powdered products regarding thermal inactivation parameters of pathogens.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643822011203; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114185; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85143705336&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0023643822011203; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114185
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know