Improving chicken meat shelf-life: Coating with whey protein isolate, nanochitosan, bacterial nanocellulose, and cinnamon essential oil
LWT, ISSN: 0023-6438, Vol: 197, Page: 115912
2024
- 8Citations
- 43Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This research investigated the impact of a food coating including whey protein isolate (WPI), nanochitosan (NCH), bacterial nanocellulose (BN), and cinnamon essential oil (CEO) on the microbiological, chemical, and sensory characteristics of chicken fillets throughout 12 days of refrigerated storage. The following treatments were applied to the fillets after they were randomly separated into five groups: 1. Control, 2. WPI, NCH, and BN (WPI-NC), 3. WPI, NCH, and BN+ 0.5% CEO (WPI-NC+ 0.5% CEO), 4. WPI, NCH, and BN+ 1% CEO (WPI-NC+ 1% CEO), and 5. WPI, NCH, and BN+ 1.5% CEO (WPI-NC+ 1.5% CEO). The results revealed that incorporating CEO into the WPI-NC coating significantly improved its antibacterial activity, effectively retarding the proliferation of mesophilic bacteria, psychrotrophic bacteria, Pseudomonas spp., Enterobacteriaceae, Lactic acid bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus, and Mold and Yeast. Moreover, the coating delayed the increase of total volatile bases-nitrogen (TVB-N), peroxide value (PV), and thiobarbituric acid (TBA) levels, indicating reduced spoilage. Comparing coated fillets to the control group, sensory evaluations demonstrated that they maintained superior taste, color, and odor. Overall, the WPI-NC+ 1.5% CEO coating prolonged the shelf life of chicken breast fillets by more than 5 days compared to the uncoated (control) group.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643824001919; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2024.115912; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85186955045&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0023643824001919; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2024.115912
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know