Evaluation of organic indicators derived from extractable, hydrolysable and macromolecular organic matter in sedimentary tsunami deposits
Marine Geology, ISSN: 0025-3227, Vol: 443, Page: 106671
2022
- 2Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Due to the high population density and sensitive infrastructures, coastal areas are highly vulnerable to various geohazards such as tsunamis. The impact of tsunamis is traceable in sedimentary archives providing an important tool for reconstructing these events. Here, geochemical and physical evidence of the resulting inundations have been discussed over the last years with increasing interest on identifying and using highly specific tsumanite indicators. To investigate a broader range of potential organic indicators, a multi-tiered geochemical analysis has been applied on tsunami deposit from Japan and Hawaii in this study with the aim to detect and quantify a more comprehensive set of suitable marker compounds. Both areas of investigation differed especially in terms of population and anthropogenic influence. The analyzed fractions of organic matter covered not only the low molecular weight compounds of the extractable and hydrolysable fraction (a part of the non-extractable fraction), but also the macromolecular matter. Three consecutive analytical approaches including extraction, alkaline hydrolysis and pyrolysis have been applied on the sedimentary organic matter to study their potential to contrast between tsunami and non-tsunami layers. The analyses of compound ratios as well as individual concentration profiles in tsunami and non-tsunami layers revealed two parameters, the TAR FA (terrigenous to aquatic ratio of fatty acids) and the C 29 /C 27 sterol ratio, which exhibit a high potential to act as tsunamite indicators. Further parameters (TAR ALK - terrigenous to aquatic ratio of n -alkanes, concentration profiles of long-chain n -aldehydes) showed a minor potential but are worth to be considered in organic geochemical analyses of tsunami affected sediment archives in the future.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002532272100253X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2021.106671; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85117286198&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002532272100253X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2021.106671
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know