Machine learning for 3D printed multi-materials tissue-mimicking anatomical models
Materials & Design, ISSN: 0264-1275, Vol: 211, Page: 110125
2021
- 55Citations
- 86Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Polyjet, a material jetting 3D printing technique, has been widely used for the fabrication of patient-specific anatomical models owing to the toolless fabrication technique and its ability to print multiple materials in a single part. Although the fabrication of anatomical models with high dimensional accuracy has been demonstrated, 3D printed anatomical models with tissue-mimicking properties have not been realized. In this study, a composite layering design was used to tune the shore hardness and compressive modulus of the Polyjet-printed parts in an attempt to mimic the properties of human tissues. 216 specimens (with 72 combinations of design parameters) were printed and tested to develop the material library for the anatomical models. An analytical model was developed to estimate the effective compressive modulus and shore hardness of the composite laminate. A neural network was used to learn the multi-dimensional relationship between the design parameters and mechanical properties. The 5-33-2 network size is found to be the optimum neural network structure with a mean square error of 0.98% for the compressive modulus, lower than the traditional response surface method model. A genetic algorithm was used to search the design space for the most optimum design parameters for the targeted effective shore hardness.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127521006808; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110125; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85116860897&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0264127521006808; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110125
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know