Cold sintering: A promising in situ resource utilisation strategy to densify lunar regolith simulants for construction applications
Materials & Design, ISSN: 0264-1275, Vol: 238, Page: 112674
2024
- 5Citations
- 20Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Harbin Institute of Technology Researchers Have Published New Study Findings on Materials and Design (Cold sintering: A promising in situ resource utilisation strategy to densify lunar regolith simulants for construction applications)
2024 FEB 07 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Tech Daily News -- Data detailed on materials and design have been presented.
Article Description
Sintering lunar regolith simulants as building materials is an effective method to establish long-term lunar bases. However, the high energy consumption of conventional thermal sintering is a challenge for energy-scarce lunars. The cold sintering process (CSP), which densifies ceramics with the assistance of transient solvent, offers a solution to overcome the aforementioned problems. Utilizing the CSP at 150 °C, 200 MPa, and 15 wt% 10 mol NaOH for 90 min, the density and compressive strength of the samples reached 2.44 g/cm 3 and 207 MPa, respectively. The energy consumption of CSP equipment is only 0.86 kW·h, which is 6.66 times lower than that of conventional thermal sintering (5.73 kW·h). Furthermore, the compressive strength of the samples after three cool-heat cycles temperature between −196 °C and 150 °C was 205 MPa, indicating that the samples maintained high reliability in a simulated lunar environment. This excellent performance is attributed to the NaOH solution dissolving the oxide clusters on the particle surface, and the precipitation-generated glass phase connecting adjacent particles, making the particles consolidated and densified. Therefore, the cold sintering process presents promising prospects for the energy-efficient fabrication of lunar construction materials with excellent mechanical strength and durability.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127524000467; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2024.112674; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85183649809&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0264127524000467; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2024.112674
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know