A self-assembled carbon nanotube/silicon composite battery anode stabilized with chemically reduced graphene oxide sheets
Materials & Design, ISSN: 0264-1275, Vol: 240, Page: 112861
2024
- 14Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This study presents a streamlined fabrication process for lithium-ion battery (LIB) electrodes, involving the dispersion of carbon nanotubes (CNT), silicon (Si), and graphene oxide (GO) in an aqueous solution, followed by vacuum filtration to produce self-standing composite electrodes. Two reduction routes are employed to form reduced graphene oxide (rGO). The chemically reduced CNT/Si/rGO-5 %-Chem anode exhibits superior mechanical resilience compared to thermally reduced counterparts, which suffer from reduced strength and structural integrity. Chemical reduction also enhances electrochemical performance, increasing the initial capacity of the non-reduced CNT/Si/GO-5 % composite anode from 1,461 to 2,342 mAh g −1, with improved long-term cycling performance. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy shows lower pre-cycle charge transfer resistance (148 Ω) and superior solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) resistance (43 Ω) for chemically reduced anodes compared to thermally reduced ones. After cycling, the chemically reduced composite anode exhibits reduced electrolyte resistance and charge transfer resistance, indicating stable electrochemical reactions. The composite structure undergoes adaptive rearrangements during cycling, optimizing active material utilization. In summary, CNTs accommodate silicon swelling, while chemically reduced rGO promotes stable SEI formation, highlighting the benefits of chemical reduction in enhancing mechanical durability and electrochemical performance, making the self-standing CNT/Si/rGO composite film a promising LIB anode.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026412752400234X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2024.112861; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85188520814&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S026412752400234X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2024.112861
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know