Effectiveness of fly ash, zeolite, and unburnt rice husk as a substitute of cement in concrete
Materials Today: Proceedings, ISSN: 2214-7853, Vol: 61, Page: 237-242
2022
- 15Citations
- 36Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This experimental study analyzed the impacts of unburnt rice husk, fly ash, and zeolite on the strength of glass powder added concrete. At the first stage of the study up to 30% mass of fine aggregates was replaced by glass powder to understand the impact of the glass powder on the strength of concrete. Study results show that increasing the concentration of glass powder tends to decrease the compressive strength of the concrete. The relative decrease in compressive strength with 10% and 30% content of glass powder was measured at 9.5% and 13.3%, respectively. Furthermore, at a 10% constant concentration of glass powder several concrete specimens were prepared using unburnt rice husk, fly ash, and zeolite powder as replacement of cement (up to 15%). Study results indicate that the use of unburnt rice husk, fly ash, and zeolite with the combination of glass powder decreases the compressive strength of concrete. The lowest reduction rate was observed for fly ash added concrete, while the addition of unburnt rice husk shows the highest reduction in compressive strength.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214785321057904; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.005; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85128873878&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214785321057904; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.005
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know