Study on utilization of machine learning techniques for geological CO 2 sequestration simulations
Materials Today: Proceedings, ISSN: 2214-7853, Vol: 72, Page: 378-385
2023
- 4Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In Geological Carbon Sequestration (GCS), CO 2 is injected and stored in geological formations. Conducting these studies through experiments could be highly impractical both economically and scientifically. Employing conventional numerical techniques was proven to be computationally intensive and slow with complex geometrical models. In this work, a study is conducted to integrate traditional numerical simulation results with machine learning techniques to forecast the futuristic trend of output parameters. Primary simulations are performed using multiphase flow modelling for the entire geological time scale. Then the time series neural network is used by considering CO 2 sequestration parameter values as input and target data to forecast the trend of output parameters during the post-injection time. Both recurrent neural network models have shown a reasonable forecast of the output variables. Among the different training algorithms used, the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) algorithm has given a good prediction for the output variable; the results are validated with the RMSE and R-squared values for obtained values. The R 2 and RMSE values of the NAR model for structural trapping are 0.9801 and 0.0515, respectively, and for residual trapping, they are 0.9805 and 0.0506, respectively. This work will provide the initial understanding of integrated machine learning techniques in the GCS analysis for a heterogeneous reservoir model.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214785322052658; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.109; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85136204431&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214785322052658; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.109
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know