Non-syndromic hearing loss gene identification: A brief history and glimpse into the future
Molecular and Cellular Probes, ISSN: 0890-8508, Vol: 29, Issue: 5, Page: 260-270
2015
- 82Citations
- 165Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations82
- Citation Indexes82
- 82
- CrossRef73
- Captures165
- Readers165
- 165
Review Description
From the first identified non-syndromic hearing loss gene in 1995, to those discovered in present day, the field of human genetics has witnessed an unparalleled revolution that includes the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003 to the $1000 genome in 2014. This review highlights the classical and cutting-edge strategies for non-syndromic hearing loss gene identification that have been used throughout the twenty year history with a special emphasis on how the innovative breakthroughs in next generation sequencing technology have forever changed candidate gene approaches. The simplified approach afforded by next generation sequencing technology provides a second chance for the many linked loci in large and well characterized families that have been identified by linkage analysis but have presently failed to identify a causative gene. It also discusses some complexities that may restrict eventual candidate gene discovery and calls for novel approaches to answer some of the questions that make this simple Mendelian disorder so intriguing.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890850815000353; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2015.03.008; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84946493068&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25845345; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0890850815000353; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2015.03.008
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know