Animal image identification and classification using deep neural networks techniques
Measurement: Sensors, ISSN: 2665-9174, Vol: 25, Page: 100611
2023
- 14Citations
- 50Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Animal identification research, there haven't been many effective methods introduced, especially in the area of predator species. In this article, we provide a reliable learning strategy for categorising animals from camera-trap photos captured in naturally inhabited areas with high densities of people and noise. To deal with noisy labels, we offered two distinct network architectures—one with clean samples and the other without. We separate the training data into groups with various properties using k-means clustering. Then, other networks are trained using these groupings. Then, using maximum voting, these more diverse networks are used to jointly forecast or correct sample labels. We test the effectiveness of the suggested method using two publicly accessible camera-trap picture datasets, Snapshot Serengeti and Panama-Netherlands. Our findings show that our method is more accurate and surpasses state-of-the-art techniques for classifying animal species from camera-trap photos with high levels of label noise.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665917422002458; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2022.100611; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85144567871&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2665917422002458; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2022.100611
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know