Surface hardness monitoring of laser shock Peening: Acoustic emission and key frame selection
Measurement, ISSN: 0263-2241, Vol: 199, Page: 111560
2022
- 18Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Acoustic emission (AE) technology has great potential in online monitoring of laser shock peening (LSP). Still, its high sampling frequency leads to a large amount of real-time calculation, posing a great challenge to the industrial application of monitoring technology. Attention weight statistics (AWS) is proposed to obtain the key frames of AE signals in LSP processing to solve this problem. Compared with the original AE signal, key frames set of the signal provide greater test accuracy while effectively reducing the amount of data. Based on the highest accuracy and the shortest test time of key frames set, the best sensors of signal acquisition in four different sensors are evaluated, and the results can be used as a reference for future experiments. Finally, the physical significance of AE signal key frames is explained with time–frequency domain analysis.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026322412200776X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111560; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85133639143&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S026322412200776X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111560
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know