Assessment of the double-parameter iterative Tikhonov regularization for single-epoch measurement model-based precise GNSS positioning
Measurement, ISSN: 0263-2241, Vol: 218, Page: 113251
2023
- 4Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The double-parameter iterative Tikhonov regularization is assessed for strengthening the single-epoch model-based precise GNSS positioning within the framework of cognitive meanings. The simultaneous iterative Tikhonov regularization of the least-squares (LS) estimators of the parameters of interest in the single-epoch GNSS model is analyzed to enhance their accuracy properties. Regularization parameters (RP) are collected in the regularization operator, which can play a standardizing role in the regularization principle. Thus, the double-parameter approach can consider the heteroscedasticity of the LS estimators of interest in the regularization principle. This approach employs the quality-based mean squared error (mse) matrix trace minimization criterion to select optimal double-RP values simultaneously. Then, the unconstrained LS estimation is iteratively regularized, obtaining regularized float solutions. The numerical tests indicate that the double-parameter approach successfully strengthens the single-epoch GNSS measurement models due to considering the heteroscedasticity of the LS estimators of interest in the regularization principle. The regularized variance–covariance (vc) matrix describes float solutions of improved precision properties at the cost of losing the LS estimator’s unbiasedness. The accuracy is thus superior in the sense of mse. Therefore, the regularized LS estimator is well-scaled but with a biased localization. It also provides a more peaked probability density function (PDF) of real-valued ambiguities, obtaining a lower failure rate (FR) of integer least-squares (ILS) ambiguity resolution (AR). In this way, the regularized ILS estimator performs well in the ambiguity domain with the presence of regularized bias.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263224123008151; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113251; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85164013743&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263224123008151; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113251
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know