Magnetic field enhancing preferred orientation of nickel-cobalt plated carbon fibers in cement paste, with relevance to compression self-sensing
Measurement, ISSN: 0263-2241, Vol: 220, Page: 113396
2023
- 3Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The arrangement of carbon fibers in the cement matrix affects the stability and sensitivity of the composite. This study investigated the effects of bath pH and electroless plating time on the magnetic metallization (nickel coating, cobalt coating, and nickel-cobalt alloy coating) on carbon fibers and successfully prepared the CFRCs in which the metal-plated carbon fibers could be oriented by magnetic fields. The results showed that a pH of 10 and a plating time of 6 min were favorable for reaction kinetics, with the thickness gain, conductivity, and saturation magnetization of metal coatings all being the largest. The compressive strength of the prepared composites was increased by 26.5% by adding nickel-cobalt coated carbon fibers, which is attributed to the alignment of fibers refining pore structure. The resistivity of CFRCs with metal-plated carbon fibers is one order lower in magnitude than that with uncoated carbon fiber, due to that the alignment of fibers increases the conduction connectivity by decreasing the distance of fiber-fiber and the “quantum tunneling”. The cyclic compressive loading tests showed that the resistance changed reversibly with strain, such that the degree of reversibility is higher for CFRCs with pre-magnetic treatment than those without the treatment. The piezoresistivity (strain sensitivity) of CFRCs was stronger with magnetic field-induced orientation treatment, showing that the strain sensitivity increased by 114% after pre-magnetic treatment for CFRCs containing nickel-cobalt coating. This is attributed to that the well-aligned metal-plated carbon fibers form more conduction paths along the alignment direction, such that the resistivity along this direction is more sensitive to the compressive strain parallel to this direction.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263224123009600; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113396; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85169930358&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263224123009600; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113396
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know