A review of different types of weigh-in-motion sensors: State-of-the-art
Measurement, ISSN: 0263-2241, Vol: 225, Page: 114042
2024
- 16Citations
- 44Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Weigh-in-motion (WIM) systems provide the opportunity to measure the weight of vehicles, including individual axles, as they pass over the pavement. This study focuses on the evaluation of different WIM systems, the applications of WIM sensors, and the comparison of existing WIM sensors, particularly smart concrete sensors with self-sensing capabilities. To achieve this objective, various types of concrete sensors were investigated. These sensors are capable of measuring weight while in motion, monitoring the structural health of pavements, and collecting traffic data. Smart concrete sensors with self-sensing capabilities are composed of concrete composites that contain conductive or semi-conductive fillers, enabling the measurement of stress and strain through piezoresistive properties. The findings indicate that self-sensing concrete sensors can be effectively utilized for traffic properties measurement; however, ensuring their reliability in real-field conditions and practical applications necessitates further research.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263224123016068; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.114042; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85180774369&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263224123016068; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.114042
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know