Lite RGB-based measurement method for ballast fouling index prediction through subsampling
Measurement, ISSN: 0263-2241, Vol: 234, Page: 114813
2024
- 1Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Ballasted track is the major form of freight railroads. Despite various requirements for material selection, ballast will degrade due to wear and the infiltration of fine materials. These fine particles will cause ballast fouling and degraded track performance. The fouling condition is directly related to both ballast performance and track maintenance planning. It can be quantitatively assessed using the Fouling Index (FI), calculated as the sum of the percentages of materials passing through No. 4 (4.75 mm) and No. 200 (75 µm) sieves. Traditional fouling assessment methods rely on labor-intensive sieve analysis. While non-destructive techniques such as Ground Penetration Radar, Impulse Response, Surface Wave, and SmartRock offer alternatives, they require specialized equipment and skilled technicians for accurate interpretation. Deep learning models have also been employed, trying to assess ballast fouling conditions by segmenting particles. However, these models struggle to account for fine materials. Recently, the FI was found to be linearly correlated with the variance of RGB (Red, Green, Blue) intensities in fouled ballast images, and this correlation could be used to assess ballast fouling conditions. Improving upon the previously developed FI prediction model and making it more practical, this study proposes an enhanced and lite RGB-based model that predicts the FI through a simple random subsampling approach. The optimal subsample size is determined both experimentally and analytically. Based on the results obtained from this study, the correlation between FI and the variance of RGB intensities in fouled ballast images is further confirmed. The proposed lite model can achieve the same accuracy in FI prediction but requires fewer than 1 % of the data points needed by previous methods, which demonstrates its promising potential for ballast fouling condition assessment practice.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263224124006985; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114813; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85192673271&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263224124006985; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114813
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know