An alternate approach for estimating grain-growth kinetics
Measurement, ISSN: 0263-2241, Vol: 234, Page: 114884
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Rate of grain growth, which aides in achieving desired properties in polycrystalline materials, is conventionally estimated by measuring the size of grains and tracking its change in micrographs reflecting the temporal evolution. Techniques adopting this conventional approach demand an absolute distinction between the grains and the interface separating them to yield an accurate result. Edge-detection, segmentation and other deep-learning algorithms are increasingly adopted to expose the network of boundaries and the associated grains precisely. An alternate approach for measuring grain-growth kinetics, that curtails the need for advanced image-processing treatment, is presented in this work. Grain-growth rate in the current technique is ascertained by counting the number of triple-( and quadruple-) junctions, and monitoring its change during the microstructural evolution. The shifted focus of this junction-based treatment minimises the significance of a well-defined grain-boundary network, and consequently, the involvement of the sophisticated techniques that expose them. A regression-based object-detection algorithm is extended to realise, and count, the number of junctions in polycrystalline microstructures. By examining the change in the number of junctions with time, the growth rate is subsequently determined. Growth kinetics estimated by the present junction-based approach, across a wide-range of multiphase polycrystalline microstructures, agree convincingly with the outcomes of the conventional treatment. Besides offering a novel technique for grain-growth measurement, the analysis accompanying the current work unravels a trend, compatible with the topological events, in the progressive evolution of the triple-junctions count. The present approach, through its underlying algorithm, provides a promising option for monitoring grain-growth during in-situ investigations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263224124007693; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114884; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85193299899&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263224124007693; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114884
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know