Fault diagnosis method for hydropower unit via the incorporation of chaotic quadratic interpolation optimized deep learning model
Measurement, ISSN: 0263-2241, Vol: 237, Page: 115199
2024
- 8Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Hydro-turbine fault diagnosis is crucial for hydropower plants’ safe and stable operation. This paper proposes a deep learning model for hydro-turbine fault diagnosis based on chaotic quadratic interpolation optimization (CQIO). Chaotic mapping optimizes the initial population of the QIO algorithm by introducing randomness and diversity, improving the algorithm’s performance and stability. The CQIO is used to calculate the optimal hyperparameter combinations for CNN-LSTM models. It can improve the model’s stability and reduce computational resource consumption. The results show that the fault accuracy of the proposed method reaches 96.7% and 93.6%, respectively, which is higher than the CNN, LSTM, CNN-LSTM, and QIO-CNN-LSTM models. Notably, the diagnostic accuracy about impact faults exceeds that of wear faults, with the latter exhibiting an augmented diagnostic accuracy as sediment increases.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263224124010844; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115199; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85197135781&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263224124010844; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115199
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know