A novel CNN architecture for robust structural damage identification via strain measurements and its validation via full-scale experiments
Measurement, ISSN: 0263-2241, Vol: 239, Page: 115393
2025
- 8Citations
- 26Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this study, an innovative two-dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (2D CNN) architecture is proposed and investigated for the classification of bridge damage. Employing unique strain time-history data transformed into grayscale images, the approach seamlessly combines feature extraction and classification, allowing for the precise identification and categorization of structural damage. The method’s effectiveness was validated through field experiments on a full-scale bridge mock-up sample subjected to several controlled damage states under nonstationary, commercial vehicle loads. A wide range of realistic damage conditions, from minor to severe structural damage states, was included in the experimental scenarios together with inherent operational uncertainties. The robustness of the 2D CNN model was rigorously tested against fluctuating loads and introduced noise. Demonstrating remarkable accuracy, the 2D CNN successfully classified different damage states with over 95% accuracy, effectively identifying a damage state that was visually undetectable. Furthermore, the architecture proved to be highly versatile, effectively handling variations in the number of sensors. uncertainties included in the experimental data, and elevated levels of measurement noise.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263224124012788; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115393; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85200824956&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263224124012788; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115393
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know