Core body temperature estimation model with thermal contact resistance compensation
Measurement, ISSN: 0263-2241, Vol: 241, Page: 115687
2025
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
Continuous and accurate monitoring of core body temperature (CBT) is crucial for personal healthcare, clinical disease diagnosis, and enhancing athletic performance. Current CBT measurement methods typically ignore contact interface variation at the sensor-body interface, resulting in insufficient CBT measurement accuracy under daily wearable scenarios with varying sensor contact pressure. This study proposed a core temperature estimation model with thermal contact resistance (TCR) compensation, introducing the TCR factor into the computational equation to improve estimation accuracy in daily wearable scenarios. A numerical simulation of the temperature field between the human forehead and sensor was developed for model performance evaluation. Given the inconvenience of TCR measurement, this study proposed a method based on pressure/optical photoplethysmography (PPG) signals for updating thermal contact resistance. The mean absolute error of CBTER model under varying thermal contact resistance conditions was 0.26 °C, which was 27 % compared to traditional model errors in simulation. Using pressure updating methods, the result of human trials was 0.01±0.23 °C (with 95 % limits of agreement). Overall, the proposed method effectively compensated for errors in core body temperature estimation due to thermal contact resistance, holding potential for continuous core body temperature monitoring to meet healthcare needs scenarios.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know