On the severity of aortic stenosis in ascending aortic aneurysm: A computational tool to examine ventricular-arterial interaction and aortic wall stress
Mechanics Research Communications, ISSN: 0093-6413, Vol: 110, Page: 103621
2020
- 6Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
An ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) is a life-threatening cardiovascular consequence of vessel dilatation that portends adverse events and death. From a clinical perspective, ATAA should not be treated as an isolated disease, and surgery is often carried out in the presence of AS, aortic insufficiency or a calcified valve leaflet. Aortic stenosis (AS) is common in ATAAs and leads to both vessel rigidity and left ventricular (LV) impairment. In this study, lumped-parameter modeling and computational analysis were used to assess the change in the wall shear stress (WSS) and intramural wall stress of patient-specific ATAA models with different degrees of AS (i.e., mild to severe). The ATAAs of four patients were reconstructed from imaging data and AS was simulated virtually using the lumped-based CircAdapt tool using clinical and echocardiographic data. Results show that LV work derived from pressure-volume loops increased with the severity of AS. Post-stenotic hemodynamic and structural variables markedly increased with AS severity, with WSS showing a 10-fold increase for the most severe AS model as compared to the baseline model with a well-functioning aortic valve. Most importantly, the increase in WSS and aortic wall stress was associated with pronounced values of valvulo-arterial impedance as an indicator of LV dysfunction. This study provides novel insights into progression of AS in patients with ATAAs at high risk of adverse events, and the potential value of valvulo-arterial impedance to predict changes in hemodynamic and structural parameters with the severity of AS.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009364132030149X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2020.103621; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85096244222&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S009364132030149X; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S009364132030149X?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S009364132030149X?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2020.103621
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know